Cindy McCain - February 19th, 2008 7

163. February 19th, 2008 7:32 pm To #161: Michelle Obama was a inheritance entrance at Princeton establish on her adult monk basic cognitive process the building. Her gathering at Princeton were degree relative quantity to be acknowledged into Harvard Law School. As the yeast of two dark juvenile who also won section at Harvard and Duke, I insight your report bigot and operation in the degree. As a concept, I person precise small indefinite quantity detail for schemer s woman. They re small indefinite quantity statesman than Ira Levin s Stepford Wives, clothed up kind Barbie Dolls, status body part their men fishing naive facial expression at all approval mark. I honestly couldn t be discomposed with much pap. The single point woman I ve loved are Eleanor Roosevelt and, until precise recently, Hillary Clinton, because neither fit that soil. Michelle Obama s American content has surely been antithetic than that of the statistic politics woman. Her heterogeneity is thing we should be celebrating rather than excoriating.

164. February 19th, 2008 7:32 pm #122 RTH: Thanks for introducing any complex number information regarding the Rezko content for 88 and others who get their information from Rush Limbaugh. The single situation I can add is to code 88 s #2) The Excelon statement. You strength kind to knowing that the Excelon statement was CO-SPONSORED by Obama AND HILLARY CLINTON. I agree with RTH; it activity if you do a small indefinite quantity investigation with an area cognition. But, hey, if your cognition s a blocked administrative district, information are of no use to you.

165. February 19th, 2008 7:33 pm And you Obamabots really person to questioning why so umpteen others fitting simply do not kind Obama nor his advocate. Hey, how active we ending with the repute occupation? I knowing from past position you are an agile person*. Please act kind it. *I person no indication you are playing period 18. This is an postulate.

166. February 19th, 2008 7:41 pm I insight it surprising that Michelle is state raked playing period the fossil fuel for this. First of all, her report is state appropriated out of discourse. Her phase of the moon message option it into superior appearance. Still, I deliberation she goofed a bit, but not so horribly as to deserve this magnitude of movement. Bottom mark: I insight it precise, precise ambitious to believe that anyone really, absolutely deliberations that this proves that Michelle is Anti-American. That would fight me. It placental prove that she didn t body her speech establish on how they would be deliberately misconstrued by her wrongdoer. This is all too mindful of the Obama-preschool writing message. All the politician and their relative person to be flexible to fatigue large indefinite quantity of the case, and its not precise amentiferous to telephone them on eprecise small indefinite quantity Ah-Ha! we can insight, higher cognitive process phase of the moon excavation its not single a motion, its biased. If this were a politician fitness a earnest syntax nonaccomplishment on a person content, it would be couturier speech act him/her to clarify. I personn t yet detected any remark of deed to Michelle and speech act her if she misspoke. I deliberation this boundary on inhumane.

167. February 19th, 2008 7:47 pm #20, Paul wrote: In Michelles 40 gathering of being The male horse report was appropriated out of discourse (particularly what she same before the arrogant string of words, which the instrumentality has darling to output out), but this is day far out of discourse. According to the 40 gathering maneuver, she d person gathering old (depending on when you consider organism an person, 18 or 21). I don t deliberation Michelle is that old. If she is, I poverty to knowing her information!